Almost two thirds of Scots want Alex Salmond's Government to come up with an alternative to a currency union for an independent Scotland, a poll has suggested.
The survey found 64.8% of those questioned wanted the Scottish Government to produce a "Plan B" before September's referendum.
The research, for the Daily Mail newspaper, was carried out after Chancellor George Osborne last week ruled out doing a deal to allow a separate Scotland to share the pound with the rest of UK.
Labour shadow chancellor Ed Balls and Liberal Democrat Chief Secretary to the Treasury followed suit by rejecting a currency union.
In the wake of that, polling company Survation questioned 1,005 people aged 16 and over on the issue on Monday and Tuesday of this week.
A fifth of those questioned (20.1%) did not believe the Scottish Government required to draw up an alternative to its plans for a currency union, while 15.1% said they did not know.
The same poll also put the gap between support for independence and support for the Union at just nine points.
A total of 46.6% of those questioned wanted Scotland to remain in the UK, while 37.7% were backing independence, with 15.7% undecided.
Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the poll was "exceptionally encouraging" for the Yes campaign.
She said: "It is clear that there has been a severe backlash to George Osborne's bluster and threats on the pound - with more than half of the No campaign's lead wiped out in just three weeks, and far more people more likely to vote Yes on the back of the Westminster establishment's attempted bullying rather than No."
Ms Sturgeon went on: "The pound is Scotland's currency every bit as much as the rest of the UK's, and what this poll shows is that the Scottish Government's policy for a formal sterling area between an independent Scotland and the rest of the UK is the clear preference of the people of Scotland - with 55% support when 'don't knows' are excluded.
"The Scottish Government's expert Fiscal Commission Working Group - comprised of internationally respected economists, including two Nobel Laureates - examined all of the possible currency options and concluded that a currency union is best for both Scotland and the rest of the UK.
"And a formal sterling area is more than twice as popular as the next option in terms of what people in Scotland think will happen after independence.
"What this poll illustrates above all is that the people of Scotland are calling the bluff of George Osborne, Ed Balls and Danny Alexander - whose actions last week have given a big boost to the Yes campaign."
Blair Jenkins, chief executive of the pro-independence Yes Scotland campaign, said the research "continues the trend we are finding of an ever-narrowing gap in voting intentions - now down to just single figures, and needing a swing of less than five points to put Yes ahead".
He added: "The fact that the Survation poll was carried out in the wake of Chancellor George Osborne's visit to Edinburgh, with his threatening bluster on the pound, merely mirrors our findings of recent days that many more voters are coming to us to declare their support since last week.
"All the evidence we have is that the warnings and threats delivered by Mr Osborne and his Westminster allies in Labour and the Lib Dems have backfired badly on the No campaign."
A separate poll which was also published today put the Yes vote at 29%, with 42% planning on voting No, and 29% undecided.
The TNS poll was carried out in the first week of February, before the Tories, Labour and Liberal Democrats all ruled out a currency union.
TNS head in Scotland Tom Costley said: "The debate on independence has stepped up a gear in the last few days.
"Opinion in Scotland showed little change over the last few months, with a relatively high level of don't knows, and our polls have consistently shown that people are looking for more information on which to make their decision.
"It may be that the recent activity, especially the firm statement by the anti-independence parties on the future of the pound, will stimulate more debate, bring out more information and help undecided voters to make up their minds."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article