A DRUG that cuts the blood supply to tumours can significantly extend the lives of women with advanced cervical cancer, a study has shown.
Compared with those on chemotherapy alone, patients taking Avastin typically lived nearly four months longer.
The percentage of patients responding to therapy also increased by one-third from 36% to almost half with the addition of Avastin.
The targeted drug, generically known as bevacizumab, is a laboratory-made antibody that directly combats the generation of tumour-nourishing blood vessels.
It is approved within the EU for advanced stages of bowel, ovarian, breast, lung and kidney cancers. Around 300 new cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed every year in Scotland and doctors said there was a desperate need for more treatment options for the disease.
The latest results from the Phase III GOG240 trial, funded by the US National Cancer Institute.
A total of 452 women with advanced cervical cancer who were not responding to standard treatment took part in the study in the US and Spain.
Women given chemotherapy alone typically lived 13.3 months while those on Avastin survived for 17 months.
Dr Mary McCormack, consultant clinical oncologist at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, said: "There is a desperate need for more treatment options for advanced cervical cancer, so it is very encouraging to see that Avastin given with chemotherapy extends survival by four months without compromising patients'quality of life."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article