THE Government is ordering pension fund managers to come clean about hidden costs which can wipe tens of thousands of pounds off the value of retirement pots.
Pensions Minister Steve Webb said transparency in workplace defined contribution schemes was crucial so people could make good financial decisions.
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) warned last year that there was "insufficient visibility and comparability of charges" to ensure that competition in the market was fully effective.
In a written statement to MPs, Mr Webb said in future ministers would be under a statutory obligation to create rules to ensure transaction costs were more open. An amendment will be introduced to the Pensions Bill in the House of Lords tomorrow.
Mr Webb said: "Transparency of costs and charges is fundamental for good scheme governance and to enabling comparison between schemes.
"Requiring increased transparency is the latest step in the wider Government programme to see fair charges for people who are automatically enrolled into workplace pensions."
The Government has said someone who saves £100 a month over a 46-year working lifetime may lose £170,000 from their pension pot with a 1% charge and more than £230,000 with a 1.5% charge.
Shadow pensions minister Gregg McClymont said: "The Government appears to have backed down under Labour pressure on transparency over costs and charges, but ministers are only implementing half of Labour's reform agenda."
The executive director of consumer organisation Which?, Richard Lloyd, said this move alone "will not be enough to end rip-off schemes as consumers are often automatically enrolled by their employer". He added: "We also need to see a cap on charges of 0.5%."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article