The peer at the centre of a sexual harassment row has returned to the House of Lords.
Lord Rennard has been seen sitting in the chamber for what is thought to be the first time since he was suspended by the Liberal Democrats.
The party's former chief executive sat on the back row of the Lib Dem benches alongside Baroness Tonge, who was forced out of the party over comments she made about Israel.
Lord Rennard was suspended on January 20 pending an investigation into whether he had brought the party into disrepute by failing to apologise to women who made complaints against him.
A QC's inquiry into the allegations concluded that the women's claims were credible but there was insufficient evidence to bring disciplinary charges, and suggested that the peer should apologise to them.
On the day the suspension was announced, Lord Rennard was widely expected to take his seat in the Lords in what would have been interpreted as defiance of the wishes of his party leader Nick Clegg, who has insisted he must apologise before he can regain the whip.
But he failed to turn up after issuing a statement citing ill-health and threatening to take legal action against the party.
While Lord Rennard is suspended by the party, there is nothing to stop him sitting or speaking in the Lords and claiming the £300 daily allowance all peers are entitled to.
By sitting at the back of the Lib Dem block in the Upper House, Lord Rennard has followed the precedent of most peers kicked out by their parties, including expenses cheats such as Lord Taylor of Warwick and Baroness Uddin, who continue to sit on the same benches as their former colleagues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article