GAMEKEEPERS will today hand in to the Scottish Parliament a petition signed by 4000 people who want the ban on the tail docking of working dogs lifted.
The gamekeepers' leader has described the "terrible pain" endured by some dogs as a national disgrace.
In 2007, the docking of dogs' tails was made illegal in Scotland. The Scottish Gamekeepers' Association previously marched against the bill because working dogs such as spaniels and retrievers suffer frequent tail damage while working in whin and bramble. Prior to the ban, working pups' tails could be shortened by a vet at two to three days old.
The SGA say all other UK countries drafted exemptions in legislation for working dogs - except Scotland.
The gamekeepers also say that at a meeting in Perth seven years ago, First Minister Alex Salmond promised that an SNP-led government would reverse the ban, if research backed the move.
"Seven years later, and 14 months after the SGA was told that research by Glasgow University would be available 'in weeks', the research remains unpublished," said a spokesman.
"The SGA understands research will show that 56% of working spaniels surveyed in one season - since the ban - suffered at least one tail injury. Tail injury often leads to amputation - a procedure which is more distressing for an adult dog than the docking of a pup's tail."
The petition asks the SNP administration to fulfil the promise made by the First Minister to reverse the ban.
SGA chairman Alex Hogg said its online survey showed there were 4158 in favour of docking versus 175 against. He said: "Since the ban on hunting with dogs, never have I come across such deep anger in the countryside."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article