THE first shots in Labour's potentially bloody battle to select candidates for the 2016 Scottish Parliament elections have been fired, with the suitability of two ex-MSPs shortlisted to stand again publicly slated.
In the first known short list, Bill Butler and Des McNulty, who were ousted in Labour's dramatic 2011 Holyrood defeat, will battle it out for either the Anniesland or Clydebank and Milngavie seat.
Due to Labour's new strategy of 'twinning' constituencies, with a male and female candidate, accidental backbench MSP and ex-Glasgow councillor Anne McTaggart is expected to run for one of the constituencies.
The fall-out has also seen the re-emergence of ex-city council leader Steven Purcell, who quit almost exactly four years ago due to drugs, alcohol and stress.
A defeated candidate, journalist and ex-Labour spin doctor Andrew McFadyen, who had been promoted locally along with Mrs McTaggart by Mr Purcell, launched an attack on Mr Butler and Mr McNulty.
On his Facebook page Mr McFadyen said: "The best people to take the Labour Party forward at the next election are not those who lost the last one."
He said he would be supporting the leader of West Dunbartonshire Council Martin Rooney. Also standing is West Dunbartonshire councillor Gail Casey.
A Labour source said: "Would Andy McFadyen have been selected if he hadn't been associated with Purcell? Maybe not but I can't say it helped. It'll also be a reality check for Purcell's attempts at a new role in politics."
But a source close to Mr McFadyen said: "It was an old fashioned stitch-up."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article