SNP MSP Joan McAlpine is facing calls to resign as an official aide to First Minister Alex Salmond after referring herself to Holyrood authorities over an expenses claim.
The South of Scotland MSP asked the Scottish Parliament's Presiding Officer to consider whether she had breached rules when she claimed £1750 in expenses for employing a photographer, Jane McLachlan, for 10 days' work.
She had an affair with the photographer's husband, Mark McLachlan, before she became an MSP.
She repaid the money on October 18, 2012, which, Mrs McLachlan told a newspaper yesterday, was five days after she discovered the affair and threatened to expose it to the press.
Mrs McLachlan also said the photography work - which had been paid for in advance - had never been completed and accused the MSP of trying to "cover her tracks".
Yesterday Labour peer Lord Foulkes said Ms McAlpine should step down as Mr Salmond's parliamentary liaison officer, a role linking the First Minister with party backbenchers.
He said: "It would now be inappropriate for Miss McAlpine to continue."
Holyrood officials said an investigation would be launched and a report prepared for the govering corporate body (SPCB).
A Scottish Parliament spokesman said: "Following Ms McAlpine's request to the Presiding Officer, parliamentary officials will examine whether a claim made by the Member in 2012 was compliant with the Parliament's expenses scheme.
"A full report on the investigations will be made to the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body and it will be for the SPCB to determine whether the claim was made in accordance with the principles of the scheme."
An SNP spokesman said: "Joan referred the matter herself to the Presiding Officer, and we are confident that no breach of the rules has taken place. The matter will be addressed according to proper procedure in Scotland - not by preposterous calls from an unelected Lord at Westminster."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article