Scottish independence could be "a positive development" for the UK's flagship airline British Airways, the chief executive of the firm's parent group has said.
Willie Walsh, chief executive of International Airlines Group (IAG), said the Scottish Government's policy on air passenger duty (APD) meant that a Yes vote would be "marginally positive" for the industry.
When asked about contingency plans ahead of the September referendum during an interview on BBC Breakfast, Mr Walsh said: "If anything, it might be marginally positive because, I suspect, the Scottish Government will abolish air passenger duty because they recognise the huge impact that tax has on their economy.
"So, it is probably going to be a positive development, if it does happen, for British Airways."
The Scottish Government's white paper on independence outlines plans to reduce APD by 50% to boost international connections.
The SNP says this reduction would be "with a view to abolishing it completely".
The tax is currently reserved to Westminster.
Mr Walsh's comments were welcomed by the Scottish Government.
Transport minister Keith Brown said: "Willie Walsh - the CEO of a group which includes British Airways amongst its portfolio - can clearly see the opportunities of independence.
"A boost to tourism and travel in Scotland will have a positive impact on growth."
A Better Together spokesman said: "Breaking up the most successful economic, political and social union in history for the sake of a tax on holidays doesn't seem like the strongest argument.
"As the intervention from Standard Life made abundantly clear, leaving the UK would cost jobs here in Scotland.
"Alex Salmond's failure to tell us what will replace the pound means companies like Standard Life and RBS, which employ thousands of people in Scotland, have warned about the big risks involved in going it alone."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article