The accelerating campaign for independence has received a timely boost after two of the UK airline industry's most senior figures expressed support for Alex Salmond's policy on the so-called air travel tax.
Willie Walsh, the chief of British Airways (BA), which employs around 1300 staff north of the Border, said independence would probably be a "positive development" for the flagship airline.
He is in favour of the SNP's pledge to halve and then scrap the controversial Air Passenger Duty (APD) in the event of a Yes vote in September's referendum. The surcharge is estimated by the Nationalists to cost the tourism industry around £200 million a year.
Mr Walsh's support for the Scottish Government's position on APD was echoed by Michael O'Leary, who runs the budget operator Ryanair. Mr O'Leary said: "There's no doubt most airlines would support the position of the Scottish Government in relation to the abolition of the APD, which does untold damage to Scottish tourism."
The support from two of the industry's most senior figures boosted the Yes camp, 24 hours after Edinburgh-based Standard Life revealed it had drawn up contingency plans to move some of its operation to England in the event of a vote for independence.
Asked if BA was also making contingency plans, Mr Walsh, who heads the airline's parent company, International Airlines Group, said: "No, because we'll continue to fly to Scotland. If anything, it might be marginally positive, as I suspect the Scottish Government will abolish APD, because they recognise the huge impact that tax has on their economy. So no, it's probably going to be a positive development, if it does happen, for British Airways."
Mr O'Leary said APD was "not a narrow or small issue" and had a "penal" effect on business.
He predicted the number of visitors to Scotland would double "in five or 10 years" if the duty were scrapped.
The First Minister has made it clear an independent Scotland would initially reduce APD by 50% to boost international air links and then abolish it "when public finances allow".
The tax is currently reserved to Westminster although calls have been made for Chancellor George Osborne to use his Budget later this month to scrap it.
Keith Brown, the Scottish Transport Minister, said: "Willie Walsh, the CEO of a group which includes British Airways among its portfolio, can clearly see the opportunities of independence. A boost to tourism and travel in Scotland will have a positive impact on growth."
A Yes Scotland spokesman said: "Mr Walsh is well aware of the damage Westminster is doing to Scottish tourism with crippling Air Passenger Duty and of the Scottish Government's pledge to cut and eventually get rid of it, so he speaks from a position of real knowledge. APD is yet another unwanted imposition on top of the hated bedroom tax and Trident that a Yes vote and the powers that it would deliver can free Scotland from."
However, a spokesman for Better Together said: "Breaking up the most successful economic, political and social union in history for the sake of a tax on holidays doesn't seem like the strongest argument.
"As the intervention from Standard Life made abundantly clear, leaving the UK would cost jobs here in Scotland."
Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael emphasised Scottish-based companies were now obliged to consider the possibility of independence and were "making plans to mitigate its dangers".
He noted the Financial Reporting Council, the independent regulator on corporate governance, had issued new guidance to companies on how they should address the issue of Scottish independence in their annual reports.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article