A MAJOR trade union has been accused of a referendum "stitch-up", after its UK national executive recommended a No position without a vote of its Scottish members.
The leadership of the Wimbledon- based Communication Workers Union (CWU) approved the stance last week after what one critic described as a "sham" consultation.
The position is expected to be ratified at the union's UK conference in Bournemouth next month.
Trade unions are beginning to decide their constitutional positions ahead of September's referendum.
However, fears have been voiced that Labour-affiliated unions are effectively bypassing their Scottish members in a bid to endorse a No vote.
The CWU represents over 200,000 workers across the UK and nearly 15,000 in Scotland, including staff in the Royal Mail, British Telecom and Virgin Media.
Its consultation began last year with seven meetings across the country, at which members heard speakers from the Yes Scotland and Better Together campaigns.
The forums were hosted by CWU deputy general secretary Andy Kerr, a lifelong Labour member who sits on the party's national executive.
No votes were taken at the meetings, which were intended to take the pulse of the union rank and file.
Around the same time, the CWU published an independence briefing that Yes campaigners believed was slanted.
The CWU followed the meetings with two telephone polls, which the union's spokesman said covered around 1600 people in Scotland - around 10% of the membership north of the Border.
He said just over 60% of those polled favoured a No vote.
A motion in the name of Kerr and Billy Hayes, the union's general secretary and also a long-standing Labour member, was tabled at the CWU national executive and approved.
It recommended CWU members vote No in the poll.
The motion, a copy of which has been obtained by this newspaper, stated that local branches were free to make their own views known, but noted that the union nationally had its own recommendation: "Conference therefore endorses the NEC decision to recommend to all members in Scotland that they vote 'no' in the forthcoming Scottish independence referendum and appropriate communications are circulated to our Scottish membership to this effect."
The union's national conference, rather than a special conference of Scottish branches, will make a final decision next month.
One source close to the union said: "It was a stitch-up. The consultation was a sham."
Since 2001, the CWU has donated several million pounds to Labour.
Colin Fox, co-convener of the Scottish Socialist Party who took part in the CWU debates, said: "There was always a strong suspicion that the consultation was not as honest and as sincere as it should have been."
A CWU spokesman said: "The NEC has recommended a No vote after a wide-ranging consultation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article