Calls for a public inquiry into the year-long miners' strike are being stepped up as communities affected gear up to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the start of the most bitter industrial conflict in living memory.
A series of events will be held by miners, their families, supporters and union activists in the build-up to March 9, the date when the UK-wide action began in 1984.
The revelation that the then prime minister Margaret Thatcher secretly considered calling out the troops at the height of the strike has strengthened the belief that a full-blown inquiry should be held.
Labour MP Ian Lavery, a former president of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), has tabled an early day motion, which "regrets that nearly 30 years after the strike ended, there are still men who were wrongly arrested or convicted during the dispute, who have never received justice". More than 60 MPs are supporting the motion.
He said: "People who live in great mining communities across the UK have not forgotten the strike and they will never forget. Passions have not waned."
The strike began in Scotland at Polmaise Colliery in Stirlingshire after a decision in January 1984 by the National Coal Board to close it due to geological faults in the pit and a lack of a market for Polmaise coal.
But the NUM in Scotland failed to gain a majority vote backing a strike across all Scottish pits. An official strike was called at Polmaise on February 21, 1984, and the miners tried to persuade others to join the strike across Scotland and the UK strike began on March 9.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article