TEACHERS' leaders have warned that pupils are sitting too many school exams.
The Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) said changes intended to reduce assessment under the new Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) had failed to have an impact.
The warning comes after a report from a left-of-centre Scottish think tank called for the current system of exams to be scrapped and replaced with a single exit qualification.
The Reid Foundation report said an over-reliance on tests - partly driven by the university sector - was undermining the education system.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the EIS, said: "The report raises key questions about the purpose of education and we are sympathetic to many of its conclusions. The EIS is clear there has been significant over-assessment in the first year of the CfE programme in secondary and exit-only exams would be an idea worth considering in any review of CfE implementation."
Parent groups also warned against a system overly driven by exams. Eileen Prior, executive director of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, said: "The report... seems likely to chime with many people who want to see greater pace and momentum in the direction of travel already established in our education system."
Joanna Murphy, vice-chair of the National Parent Forum of Scotland, added: "We agree that too much emphasis on exams does not benefit all children and we would hope that, as CfE becomes more familiar to all, a better balance that results in young people's achievements, skills and successes being better recognised will be one of the benefits.
"However, society as a whole still places a big emphasis on exam results which puts schools, parents and young people under pressure to focus on this more than other areas."
A spokesman for the Reid Foundation said: "There is a risk that education policy in Scotland is trapped in a feedback loop.
"Children are put into an exam competition and parents are scared their children will lose the competition so they encourage them to compete. This is then taken as consent from parents for a competitive system.
"Actually, it would be better for both the development and the general happiness of pupils if we just let them learn and stopped testing them to death."
A Common Weal: Education was written by Brian Boyd, emeritus professor of education at Strathclyde University, in Glasgow. It states: "The present national assessment programme, with its heavy emphasis on timed, pencil-and-paper exams, is no longer fit for purpose."
Instead, the report calls for a single qualification in the last year of school.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article