THE treatment of former prisoners in communities is having a negative impact on re-offending rates, a leading academic has warned.
Fergus McNeill, professor of criminology and social work at the University of Glasgow, believes that society's caustic reception of offenders is degrading any hope of steering those freed from prison away from crime. He claims offenders need greater support from those in the community to achieve rehabilitation. He said: "It's somehow easier for us to brandcriminals as abnormal, to treat them as people who are different from us.
"But the result is rejection, which affects their reintegration process."
He said society had a duty to support ex-offenders for "two moral reasons".
He said: "First, we are often complicit in the social problems that generate crime. Implicitly, we tolerate social conditions of poverty and inequality, which are factors in driving crime rates.
"Secondly, as a matter of justice, when someone receives a punishment, we have to take responsibility for making sure the punishment ends. The reality is different; the formal punishment may end but the collateral social consequences continue."
Mr McNeill has been leading research into desistance from crime for 15 years. He has often spoken out against calls for increased punitive measures as a means to tackle crime.
Instead, Mr McNeill argues that crime rates will be reduced if offenders are offered the chance to repair the damage they have caused as opposed to simply paying a debt through punishment.
He said: "The difference is between settling that debt through suffering or through serving."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article