ED Miliband has defended his flagship jobs policy to tackle youth unemployment, which will now run for the whole of the next UK parliament to 2020, insisting that the recovery cannot be restricted to just well-off bankers.
But his means of paying for the £5.5 billion plan, through a combination of a bank bonus tax and a squeeze on the pension pots of the better off, came under attack with the Tories accusing Labour of recommitting funds over and over again and the Institute of Directors decrying the "bashing" of high earners.
Under Labour's scheme, under-25s on Jobseeker's Allowance for more than a year - two years for others - would have to take a taxpayer-subsidised job for six months or risk losing their benefits.
Firms and voluntary sector groups would provide 25 hours' employment a week over six months at the national minimum wage with the UK Government paying wages and employers' National Insurance.
Last month, it confirmed reports that funding - which includes taking the proceeds of restricting pension tax relief for high earners - was only in place for 2015/16.
But now it has made clear the scheme will be affordable right through to 2020.
Mr Miliband said: "We can't have a recovery that's just for a few banks. We've got 56,000 young people who have been unemployed for over 12 months. A Labour government will tax the bankers' bonuses and put our young people back to work."
But Sajid Javid, the Treasury Minister, said: "Labour's sums don't add up. They are proposing yet more unfunded spending, meaning more borrowing and more taxes to pay for it. And Labour's bank tax is a short-term political gimmick that they want to spend ten times over."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article