HUNDREDS of workers at the Faslane nuclear base have staged a walk-out, the first in 42 years at the plant, after rejecting what they say is a derisory pay offer from employers.
Union leaders said talks had failed to secure a fair deal for members while contractor Babcock paid "eye-watering" bonuses to top directors.
Unite said about 800 workers joined yesterday's two-hour walk-out at the Faslane and Coulport naval bases on the Clyde.
Further one-hour stoppages are planned from today as well as a work to rule and an overtime ban.
Unite national officer Ian Waddell said: "It's with disappointment that our members are taking action for the first time in 42 years at the Clyde naval base.
"It's the culmination of months of fruitless discussions with Babcock over a fair pay rise for our members.
"They were initially offered a 1% pay rise in the same year that directors were given a 9% pay rise and shareholders enjoyed a 16% increase in their dividend.
"The company made £234 million in profit; they can easily afford a fair pay rise for our members. They have been very clear - all they are looking for is a 3% pay rise, no strings attached.
"To take that decision to go on strike when you've never done it in your working life is one of the most difficult decisions they will have had to make. But they delivered a clear majority.
"There was a 95% Yes vote for strike action and they rejected the company's latest offer of a two-year deal with strings attached by 99% at a meeting last week.
"It's with a sense of grim determination that they started strike action today."
Workers involved in the action included catering staff, cleaners and employees responsible for fitting out boats and loading weapons, Unite said.
Mr Waddell said: "Nobody wants to be on strike, or be making this sacrifice.
"These are dedicated, hard-working, skilled people who have demanding jobs.
"They want to be back at work, they don't want to be standing outside protesting about a insulting pay offer.
"All they are asking for is a fair share of the profits they have helped generate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article