TWO students who were killed when a driver's car mounted the pavement and smashed into them would still be alive if he told the truth about having a history of blackouts, a fatal accident inquiry has heard.
Consultant cardiologist Dr Neil Grubb prepared a report based on medical information he was given about William Payne, 53.
He said that as Mr Payne had blacked out on four occasions, it was "reasonable" that he was not told to stop driving.
But after being told at the inquiry that Mr Payne told another doctor he had not suffered any blackouts when going through a medical test for his HGV licence he said that was "wrong".
Dr Grubb also said he would have ordered that a tilt table test was carried out on Mr Payne after the blackout episode he suffered in April 2008. The hearing was told it was carried out in December 2010, after the fatality.
Mr Payne, from Bishopbriggs, was driving his 4x4 on December 17, 2010, down North Hanover street in Glasgow city centre, when he collided with Mhairi Convy, 18, and Laura Stewart, 20.
He also injured Mark Hopwood, 39, who managed to survive.
Yesterday at Glasgow Sheriff Court Dr Grubb said he had medical records which he used to compile a report about Mr Payne.
Under cross-examination by Dorothy Bain QC, Dr Grubb said that he would have ordered a tilt table test as early as April 2008.
The tilt table test is used to diagnose fainting. When Mr Payne underwent the test after the incident his heart paused for 10 seconds.
Dr Grubb said that it was "entirely possible" that if the test was carried out in April 2008 that it would have had the same result.
The inquiry before sheriff Andrew Normand continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article