A PHOTOGRAPH of Oscar Pistorius's blood-stained prosthetic legs was used by his defence lawyer in an attempt to show the athlete was wearing them when he broke down a toilet door to get to the girlfriend he had fatally shot.
The image, showing the prosthetic limbs with white socks and stained with Reeva Steenkamp's blood up to the knee, was displayed by lawyer Barry Roux on a TV monitor at Pistorius's murder trial.
Mr Roux was trying to reinforce the Olympic athlete's claim that he shot the model by mistake on Valentine's Day last year and then desperately broke through a locked toilet door to help her.
The prosecution has attempted to cast doubt on some aspects of Pistorius's story, including his assertion that he was wearing his legs when he broke through the door using his cricket bat.
Mr Roux also cross- examined a police forensics expert for a second day in the Pretoria courtroom, and challenged JG Vermeulen's analysis of the bullet-marked toilet door.
Pistorius, 27, who vomited in court again yesterday, has said he shot Ms Steenkamp, 29, by mistake through the door, fearing there was an intruder in the house. He has pleaded not guilty to charges of murder and three firearm-related offences.
The prosecution claims he intentionally killed her after an argument.
Minutely scrutinising almost every aspect of the police investigation, Mr Roux asked why missing wooden fragments from the door were not examined, why Pistorius's story was not seriously considered and tested by the police expert, and why there was not detailed microscopic analysis of the door and any fabrics on it.
He said the defence had evidence of sock fabric embedded in the wood which would show that, as Pistorius says, he had tried to kick through it wearing his prosthetics.
Mr Roux also showed a photograph of a part of the door which he said showed a mark one of Pistorius's prosthetics had made when he kicked it.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article