LAWYERS acting on behalf of the families of the 16 men killed in the crash believe the FAI findings show that there is a "case to answer" over a criminal prosecution.
Sheriff Principal Derek Pyle said he believed several failures by Bond Offshore Helicopters to properly deal with metal particles found in the engine during routine checks could have led to the crash.
Any prosecution would be expected to be carried out under the Health and Safety Act.
But lawyers acting for some families believe it is enough to show there was a possibility that the inaction of the operators was a major factor for there to be a case to answer.
The Crown Office, however, defended its decision not to prosecute, insisting there was not enough evidence to justify a criminal investigation against Bond Offshore Helicopters for repeated breaches of health and safety rules.
Audrey Wood, whose son Stuart was one of those killed, said: "How they arrived at that decision will haunt us, as not only did we hear of multiple breaches of health and safety, but the decision was also made without all the evidence being present, as vital witness statements had not been given.
"We, the families, feel let down by the system. We just wanted answers. We will never have closure, this will go on and on for us."
The Crown Office said the Sheriff Principal had made clear that a "reasonable doubt" remained over the technical cause of the crash.
For a criminal prosecution to proceed, the cause would have to be beyond reasonable doubt.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article