Know your enemy I
Know your enemy I
IT WAS meant to be all sweetness, light and sisterhood as Nicola Sturgeon and Jackie Baillie set aside political differences to appear shoulder to shoulder at an anti-poverty event this week.
The Deputy First Minister obliged with an opening contribution that was a model of consensus. Her Labour counterpart followed by - how shall we put it? - donning her bovver boots and launching a highly partisan attack on nationalism and all its attendant evils, right down to how the latest Gers figures showed welfare would be unaffordable in an independent Scotland.
During the question session Ms Baillie reined back, pointing out that she was getting a lift back to Holyrood with the DFM.
"WERE getting a lift back to the Parliament," Ms Sturgeon commented.
Know your enemy II
It's always a good idea to know your audience in a debate. Labour's James Kelly should've remembered that during a session at Glasgow Uni. He offered wildly different figures for why Scotland's economy wasn't as robust as the UK, billions apart.
The next question from the floor began "Hello, I'm a doctor of Mathematics. My question is for James."
You know where it's going.
Know your enemy III
HAT TIP to the flat owners opposite the conference venue in Edinburgh who welcomed the Conservatives with two large window displays. "Tory scum back to your castles you spoilt little brats," said one. "No to food banks. Eat the rich. Yummy," offered the other.
One does not wish to perpetuate ageist stereotypes about the party, but the metal detectors did carry notices saying they would not interfere with pacemakers and the escalators did seem to be set to the slowest pace possible.
Guilt by association
WHAT is it about the Royal Bank of Scotland that makes people coy about past associations with it? Professor Jeremy Peat was giving evidence to MSPs on the currency union idea this week and mentioned that he had been group chief economist at RBS. He felt compelled to mention that this had been "a very long time ago."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article