SCOTS female high-security psychiatric patients must move to English facilities to receive treatment - Carstairs State Hospital no longer takes female patients, meaning psychiatric patients like Theresa Riggi are moved to Rampton Secure Hospital in Nottinghamshire.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said the situation will not change if Scotland becomes independent and cross-border arrangements will stay in place. She said: "Scotland will continue to work with other parts of the UK to ensure all restricted patients are treated in an appropriate secure facility."
Mental health experts believe there is no need for a female maximum security hospital north of the Border.
Dr Donald Lyons, chief executive of the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland, said: "Since the state hospital stopped admitting women a few years ago, I can only recall two situations where women have been required to be transferred to high-security facilities in England. I don't think there is a need for a high-security facility in Scotland."
Health officials were keen to stress Rampton is a hospital, not a prison, as is often perceived by people on the outside. Among the hospital's 350 patients is Soham murderer Ian Huntley.
Lyons also argued that if female patients remained in Scotland they would be isolated.
"It's all about striking the right balance," he said. "Patients can speak to family via video link and there can also be funding provided for relatives to visit patients. Moving to England allows them to mix with their peers and even make friends.
"Illnesses change, and in the majority of cases, mental health improves.
"A person can them move on a step down to a lower level of security back in Scotland."
The NHS claimed it would "not be practical" to run a high-security hospital in Scotland.
A spokesman for NHS National Services Scotland said: "For some very rare conditions, or for highly complex clinical needs, care is only available at one or two sites in the UK.
"We work with providers in England to co-ordinate this."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article