The UK is in the grip of a serious food adulteration crisis, says the president of the Trading Standards Institute.
Baroness Crawley said in one recent analysis of food samples, a third had been adulterated with other substances. Her warning comes in the light of the horsemeat scandal last year.
The Labour peer called on the Government at Question Time in the Lords to recognise the "serious" level of the "food adulteration crisis".
She said: "Reporting of food fraud has increased 66% since 2009, while the number of samples taken by local authorities has decreased 26%.
"Call me old-fashioned but I like my ham to actually be ham, not poultry died pink or meat emulsion, whatever that is. I want fruit juice to be just that and not laced with vegetable oil that is used in flame retardants.
"Of the 900 samples tested by West Yorkshire Trading Standards, a third were not what they were meant to be."
Lady Crawley said Professor Chris Elliott's first report into how to protect the safety and authenticity of food following the horsemeat scandal had been "highly critical of the current system's ability to tackle food crime".
She said: "What is the Government doing about the depletion of trading standards departments across the country whose job it is to track down organised criminal gangs in the food sector?"
Food Minister Lord de Mauley said the Government took the threat of food fraud "very seriously".
"Following the horsemeat fraud last year, we have been working with industry and local authorities to improve our intelligence sharing to target sampling and enforcement better," he said.
"The sample carried out by the West Yorkshire Trading Standards demonstrates the action being taken by local authorities across the UK to tackle known problem areas and in response to complaints. The findings are not representative of all food products."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article