SCOTLAND'S Catholics are shifting towards a Yes vote in the referendum because it represents core 'Old Labour' values, academics claim.
It comes after Professor Tom Devine, Scotland's pre-eminent historian, writing in The Herald yesterday, described a "silent revolution" in Catholic attitudes towards independence since the 1970s.
His fears that denominational schools would be threatened in the event of a Yes vote have also been debunked by a leading educationalist.
Professor Lindsay Paterson, professor of education policy at Edinburgh University, said he was in general agreement. He claimed people from a Catholic background had secured educational parity with Scots of other faiths by the 1970s.
He said:"As a result of that Catholics achieved striking rates of social upward mobility. Those born in the 1970s are now no more disadvantaged than anyone else."
Dr Peter Lynch, senior lecturer in politics at Stirling University, said that while it was difficult to gauge how people of an Irish Catholic background would vote on September 18, he agreed there had been a major move away from Labour in recent decades. He said: "That will feed into the independence debate."
Professor Devine, author of the acclaimed The Scottish Nation and director of the Scottish Centre of Diaspora Studies at Edinburgh University, cited recent data from the Scottish Social Attitudes survey, which suggested those aligning themselves with Catholicism were most supportive of independence and least fearful of a Yes vote.
He said the main reasons were the death of structural sectarianism and labour market discrimination, adding that by the 1990s, people from the Catholic community had educational parity with other organised religions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article