A KEY area of tourism is being damaged as climbers across the UK are being put off returning to Scottish hills where wind farms have been built, according to a new survey.
The Mountaineering Council of Scotland (MCofS) has called for more to be done to protect wild land after it polled almost 1000 mountaineers and hill walkers and found 68% believe parts of Scotland are now less appealing.
MSPs will today debate the long-term planning strategy for the development of Scotland's spaces.
Around two-thirds questioned by the MCofS said they had already been put off from visiting or revisiting places in Scotland.
More than 80% of respondents said there had to be protection for national parks, national scenic areas and core areas of wild land.
Two-thirds wanted buffer zones so developers would not be able to place industrial-scale wind farms around their perimeters. Meanwhile, 67% said wind farms were making Scotland as a whole a less appealing place to visit.
The MCofS says the findings come as large electricity generation and other renewables companies lobby the Scottish Government to abandon proposals for stronger planning guidelines.
David Gibson, the body's chief officer, said the survey was a warning to the Scottish Government that badly sited wind farms were a threat to Scotland's reputation as a tourism destination.
He said: "Many of the wind farms planned for Scotland's most remote and beautiful areas have yet to be built and the evidence from this, and other surveys, suggests that visitors dislike them more and more as they cease to be a novelty."
He said natural heritage tourism was worth £1.6 billion to the Scots economy and tourism and that he had written to Energy, Enterprise and Tourism Minister Fergus Ewing, asking for a meeting.
He added: "It is deeply disturbing that the renewables lobby is using all its influence to push the Scottish Government into abandoning proposals that would give some protection to one of Scotland's greatest natural assets."
Dave Turnbull, chief executive of the British Mountaineering Council, which represents climbers and hill walkers in England and Wales, said: "The away from it all feel of the Scottish mountains is one of their biggest attractions to walkers and climbers from south of the border.
"People will vote with their feet and start avoiding areas with intrusive wind farm developments."
Andrew Northcott, a climber from England, recalling a recent climb in Highland Perthshire said: "I headed up Meall nam Fuaran from Glen Quaich. It was my first walk in the Highlands for almost a year. There should have been a fabulous view towards snow-covered mountains, but someone had put a wind farm high up at 600 meters, changing the wild experience and obscuring the view."
Joss Blamire, senior policy manager for industry body Scottish Renewables, said the biggest threat to the environment was climate change, with renewable energy one of the most effective solutions. However, he said the industry knew it "doesn't mean we can or should build anywhere."
He added: "What today's survey shows is that, even within the hillwalking community, opinions about the aesthetics of wind farms are wide-ranging. In fact, some large scale projects are now attractions in their own right, from the hydro power stations in Cruachan and Pitlochry to the wind farm at Whitelee near Glasgow."
He said a study, conducted on behalf of Scottish Renewables in March last year, found 69% of those surveyed in Scotland said their decision to visit an area would not be affected if there was a wind farm there.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "There is strong public support for the development of wind power, but we agree that it is important that we have the right developments in the right places, and balance protection of our scenic and wild areas alongside the need to reduce the carbon emissions of the energy sector and help keep the lights on. Our planning policy is designed to help achieve that balance."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article