IT is a nine-year, £325 million IT contract linking, initially, 4600 NHS and local authority sites, with the prospect of extending the network to every public sector body in Scotland.
Capita, which won the contract, is now creating the computer network that could potentially link every hospital, clinic, pharmacy, school, university, council office, Government department, police and fire station.
BT had been in the running for the contract and had taken legal action after it missed out.
It still hopes for £20m compensation.
Yesterday, Capita executive director of IT services, Peter Hands, aware that other public IT schemes have foundered, insisted the network will be trouble-free. He says other failures involved difficult specifications and the creation of complex software solutions.
The Scottish Wide Area Network (Swan), which is aiming to save the bodies £4m a year, is not like that, says Mr Hands. It is huge but not all that complex. It does not involve bespoke software and complex "re-engineering" of business systems. Instead, it is like buying a big number of off-the-shelf boxes with a simple system to link them.
The more public sector bodies join, the cheaper it will become and the greater the savings, insists Mr Hands, who was born in Saltcoats and is a graduate of Strathclyde University.
He says the push for Swan came partly from the need for savings, and from the political imperative to link NHS and local authority systems to cope with social care services' demands.
Mr Hands rejected fears that linking so many sys-tems would have data protection implications. "Swan will not hold any information. It is simply a network to move information," he said.
He insists the ability to share information comes from informed decisions by each organisation - social work, GPs, or potentially the police when dealing with vulnerable adults.
"All we do is remove barriers to responsible bodies seeking to share information, where previous IT syst-ems acted as an impediment to that," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article