ALEX Salmond is facing growing pressure to update his oil revenue forecasts after estimates used by the UK Government were cut by nearly £3billion.
Politicians and economists called on the Scottish Government to revisit a key report from last year which predicted the country would raise at least £34.6billion in North Sea taxes between now and 2017/18.
The demands came after the independent Office for Budget Responsibility again downgraded its forecasts in figures published alongside the Budget.
According to the OBR, the UK will collect £18.8billion from oil and gas tax over the same period.
The more optimistic Scottish Government estimates - issued a year ago - have been used repeatedly by the Nationalists as the basis of claims that Scotland would be more prosperous as an independent country than if it remained part of the UK.
Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson said: "Alex Salmond has consistently made wildly overstated claims about the revenue collected from oil to help fund his separation dream.
"He needs to bring forward revised oil figures now, so people in Scotland have a better idea of the real choice facing our country in September."
The Scottish Government's most cautious estimate for oil revenues in 2016/17 - the year it plans to declare independence - is £6.8billion.
The figure is more than double the OBR projection of £3.2billion for the same year.
The Scottish Government report making the predictions, the Oil and Gas Analytical Bulletin, already appears to have overestimated revenues for the current financial year.
It predicted receipts of up to £8.3billion for 2013-14 but with 10 months' tax so far collected, the total has only reached £4.7billion.
The call for updated figures was backed by economist John McLaren of the CPPR think-tank based at Glasgow University.
He said: "The Scottish Government's figures are more than a year old and since then the estimates on which they are based have been updated twice by Oil and Gas UK and twice by the OBR and Department of Energy and Climate Change.
"An update is well overdue."
Mr Salmond was pressed on the issue during First Minister's Questions at the Scottish Parliament when Ms Davidson's hit out what she called his "dodgy" forecasts.
Mr Salmond refused to say whether updated figures would be produced but said: "The figures we have outlined are robust."
He said the Scottish Government's figures were based on a lower estimate of oil prices than used either by the OBR or DECC.
He added: "Given the evidence of the last 40 years, I think people are more likely to believe a Scottish Government forecast and estimations of Scottish natural resources than a Tory Party who have pocketed £300billion of Scottish resources over the last 40 years."
Last year's Scottish Government oil analysis report was announced as the first in a series.
A second study was published in November but did not update the forecasts, which were quoted in the SNP's independence White Paper.
The First Minister's chief political spokesman confirmed there was no date for the next analysis paper. He was unable to say whether it would update the forecasts.
On Wednesday, the OBR downgraded forecasts by £2.9billion, between now and 2018/19, compared with its previous estimates issued in December.
In his Budget speech, Chancellor George Osborne claimed the figures showed the "precarious" nature of an independent Scotland's finances.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article