A former SNP minister has been forced to issue a public apology after he sparked a furious row over the 1984 miners' strike.
SNP MSP Adam Ingram claimed that Lord Foulkes of Cumnock, then MP for Auchinleck in Ayrshire, had been "silent" over the workers plight.
But his comments provoked a staunch backlash from the Labour peer.
He wrote to Mr Ingram, and Holyrood's presiding officer Tricia Marwick, accusing the SNP politician of lying and demanding a swift apology.
He also produced a photograph from the time showing him taking part in a protest march in support of the miners' cause.
Last night, Mr Ingram admitted he had been wrong.
In a statement he said: "I welcome Lord Foulkes' correspondence, and am pleased to be informed that he was active in assisting the miners in Ayrshire, and therefore apologise for my remarks to the contrary."
However, he added: "My wider point is that support from the Labour leadership was not as forthcoming."
In the letter, Lord Foulkes wrote: "Your assertion is a lie and you must know it to be so. I was not at all silent during the strike, in fact quite the reverse."
He added: "I am deeply upset by your untrue assertion.
"While I am more than used to the banter of politics I take great exception to you lying to make party political capital and demand that you issue a public apology immediately or I will have to consider what further action to take."
Lord Foulkes also wrote that during the strike he supported the Ayrshire National Union of Miners.
"I joined them on the picket lines at Sorn, Barony, Highhouse and Killoch pits and at Hunterston Port, where coal was being imported to try to break the strike. Indeed the police surreptitiously followed mto the police station at Largs."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article