ANOTHER trade union has been accused of a "stitch-up" for backing a No vote in the independence referendum after an event that heard a speech from only one side of the constitutional debate.
Better Together chair Alistair Darling addressed a crunch meeting of delegates at the Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers (Usdaw) Scottish conference, but no-one from Yes Scotland was represented.
The union's statement that 82% of delegates voted against independence has also been queried after it was claimed that a proportion of attendees did not vote.
Usdaw has over 400,000 members across the UK and is affiliated to the Labour Party.
In 2012, the union's annual delegate meeting in Blackpool agreed to back the Better Together campaign at a UK level.
Its in-house magazine then asked for members to send their views on independence to Usdaw's campaigns officer Karen Whitefield, a former Labour MSP and now the party's prospective Westminster candidate for Falkirk.
Delegates from Scotland were then given an opportunity to vote on independence at Usdaw's Scottish divisional conference in Dundee earlier this month.
Darling made a speech criticising independence before taking questions from delegates, but no-one from Yes Scotland appeared alongside him to make the argument in favour of independence.
After the vote, Usdaw released a statement saying the union had "overwhelmingly supported keeping Scotland in the United Kingdom, with 82% voting against independence".
But the union has now been criticised over the format of the event.
One shop steward said a number of delegates had not voted either way, and the 82% figure related to the smaller number who had participated in the ballot.
The union official said: "The union at a UK level backed Better Together and then asked delegates in Scotland to vote on independence without giving them the chance to hear both sides of the argument.
"There was little engagement with the membership.
"It has been a completely cynical exercise and a stitch-up."
Usdaw has donated over £12 million to the Labour Party since 2001 and over £25,000 to the Scottish party and local constituencies since last year.
Colin Fox, co-convener of the pro-independence Scottish Socialist Party, said: "It looks bad that a London-based union has not even allowed a Yes speaker to put the independence case to its delegates.
"Does Usdaw even know how to spell democracy?"
The Sunday Herald contacted Usdaw's press office and asked to speak to an official but no comment was forthcoming.
A spokesperson for Yes Scotland said: "It's disappointing that we weren't invited to put forward Yes Scotland's case.
"Had we been, we would have told delegates about the gains of independence for workers including how their rights would be enshrined in an independent Scotland's written constitution and how the Living Wage could be extended further across the public and private sectors."
The row comes after the UK executive of the Communication Workers Union backed a No vote without staging a special conference of Scottish members.
The GMB union was also criticised for the internal process that led to its No endorsement.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article