The president of divided council umbrella group Cosla has attacked those seeking to damage its "cohesive and powerful voice".
Cosla (Convention Of Scottish Local Authorities) has been rocked in recent weeks by a series of Labour-led councils who have signalled their intention to abandon the convention.
Councils are divided over the need to present a united front to secure a better deal for local government as a whole and disquiet over a perceived "centralising" influence of the Scottish Government, in particular its commitment to keep council tax frozen.
Cosla president David O'Neill said the convention needs to be both "comfortable with local variation" and present a "cohesive voice" to government. Mr O'Neill, leader of Labour-led North Ayrshire Council, said Cosla plays "a very significant role in working to address inequalities in Scotland".
"To be successful in the short and long term on that important goal only a cohesive and powerful voice for local government across the whole of Scotland has any chance of success," he said.
"Seeking to damage that voice is short-sighted because in the long-term the impact will be felt by those in our communities who we represent and need our support, and they won't thank us if we fail to deliver."
He added: "I have a real concern vitality of local governance is suffering. Local democracy is under pressure in Scotland. It's ailing because it is large-scale, remote and depowered due to centralisation which started in the 1960s.
"We need to not be afraid to do things differently. We need to empower local government fiscally so that real choices can be made about local services and how they are funded."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article