JUSTICE Secretary Kenny MacAskill has claimed civil justice statistics showing a fall in cases heard by sheriffs supports his planned legislation reforming the system.
But today several organisations will appear at Holyrood to argue against the Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill, including the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, which said: "The proposition could very well result in the complete collapse of the new system."
The STUC has said it is "uncomfortable" with increasing the limit for Court of Session claims from £5000 to £150,000, while Scottish Women's Aid said it was "unfortunate and worrying" that child contact cases were treated as "run-of-the mill cases." It was reported last week that the Law Society of Scotland and the Faculty of Advocates feared the changes could hamper access to justice and push legal representation out of the reach of ordinary people.
But Mr MacAskill said yesterday: "The latest civil law statistics underline why we need to reform Scotland's courts and in particular ensure that the right cases are heard in the right courts, at the right time."
The latest statistics show a 45% fall in the number of debt cases raised in Scotland's courts between 2008-09 and 2012-13, down by almost half, and a 47% drop in repossession and eviction cases in the same period.
Mr MacAskill said: "At present too many cases, particularly lower value personal injury cases, are being raised in the Court of Session - clogging up the system and resulting in higher costs and delays for the parties involved."
Thompsons, the law firm handling workplace accidents and diseases, said with "a few simple amendments" the Bill was capable of delivering its aims in a way "fairer to victims of injury and disease that will work on a practical level".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article