A FORMER Scotland rugby player has been cleared of a charge of assaulting a woman in her home.
Norrie Rowan, of Edinburgh, had denied attacking Hannah Jonathon in her flat in Spottiswoode Street in the city on June 16, 2012, and robbing her of a bag, containing her passport, a laptop, and other items. He also pled not guilty to refusing to give a DNA sample to police officers.
During a trial at Edinburgh Sheriff Court, Ms Jonathon claimed she and Rowan had been on a holiday to Ibiza, but had fallen out. On their return, she had made her own way back to her flat. She then told the court that in the early hours of the morning, Rowan had smashed in her door and slapped and punched her on the head before making off with the travel bag.
At the end of the Crown Case, defence solicitor advocate, Iain Paterson, moved that there had been no corroboration of the testimony by Ms Jonathon that his client had been in her flat and had assaulted her. The Fiscal agreed and Sheriff Gordon Liddle found Rowan not guilty of the assault and robbery charge.
Fiscal Depute Pauline Shade, however, said there was sufficient evidence to convict Rowan of failing to provide a DNA specimen after he had been detained and charged with the assault by police officers. Sheriff Liddle agreed and found Rowan guilty of that charge.
Mr Paterson told the Sheriff that after his arrest, Rowan had spent two and a half days in custody and had had the matter hanging over his head since June 2012.
Sheriff Liddle told Rowan: "It is a serious matter to interfere with police officers carrying out their duty and I have to take all factors into account. You have been on trial here for three days and incarcerated for two and a half days. That is not an over-riding factor. I also have to take into account your means. I will impose a financial penalty. I will fine you £500."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article