THE personal assistant to newspaper chief Rebekah Brooks removed boxes of her boss's notebooks from storage at the request of archive staff - not because of secret plans to scupper police investigations into phone hacking, the Old Bailey has heard.
Cheryl Carter, Ms Brooks's long-time PA, denies one count of conspiring to pervert the course of justice, along with her former boss, the ex-News of the World (NotW) editor.
Ms Carter's defence counsel Trevor Burke QC said the charge relates to allegations his client and Ms Brooks conspired to remove seven boxes held in News International archives as the NotW was on the verge of closure following phone hacking allegations, in July 2011.
He said: "It's Cheryl Carter's explanation that she was under pressure to remove (notebooks from) the archive facility as it was moving to Enfield."
The defence counsel said Ms Carter denied claims she wanted to destroy the boxes - containing notebooks and keepsakes from Ms Brooks's office during her time at News International, among other items - "to protect her beloved boss", for whom she had spent more than 15 years working.
Giving evidence from the witness box, Ms Carter described how she was "always on call" working for Ms Brooks. Ms Carter, coincidentally a school friend of Ms Brooks's former husband and ex-EastEnders actor Ross Kemp, said: "She worked fast, everything had to be done immediately.
"I was tasked by email and text. Then we had a record, even if she was standing next to me."
She added: "When I left at the end of the day I had the (office) phone diverted through to my mobile."
Ms Carter, of Chelmsford in Essex, and all other defendants deny all charges.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article