AN Indian court has granted conditional bail to 33 of the 35 crew and guards, including one Scot, from an anti-piracy patrol boat who have been held in jail since mid-October.
However, the Ukrainian-born captain and the British team leader of the guards must remain behind bars.
It is understood the conditional bail means the men, who were on the US-owned and Sri Lankan-registered Seaman Guard Ohio which had allegedly strayed into Indian waters, will not be able to leave the country.
The news was confirmed by the Mission for Seafarers, which has been visiting the men in India and has organised a fund-raising campaign to support the crew and their families.
The British guards, who are all ex-military, are Billy Irving, 33, of Oban in Argyll, John Armstrong, of Cumbria, Nick Dunn, 28, of Northumberland, Ray Tindall, 38, of Chester, and Nicholas Simpson and Paul Towers of East Yorkshire.
Yvonne Machugh, from Oban, the partner of Mr Irving, was overjoyed at the news. She visited him in the Indian jail recently and was shocked at how poorly he was. She said: "For the first time in over five months it feels like the end of this nightmare is in sight. We have a long way to go, but this is the most progress we've seen to date.
"Just knowing Billy will be out of prison within a few days and no longer being treated like a criminal is a huge relief. I can't wait to get back out to see him, this time without prison bars separating us." AdvanFort, the men's employer and owner of the Seaman Guard Ohio, said the ruling was the result of months of negotiations. It added: "They were arrested for entering Indian territorial waters, although the vessel master insists they were in international waters."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article