WILL their spring conference in Aberdeen do enough to turn round the fortunes of the Scottish Liberal Democrats?
It wasn't all bad for them, but it's hard to see the gathering giving them a big enough fillip to allow them to save their sole European seat.
Leader Willie Rennie was relentlessly upbeat, as always, and urged the same approach from the whole Better Together cause with his "sunshine strategy" but sometimes optimism cannot prevent reality intruding.
Recent by-election results have been horrible for the LibDems and in the latest ICM poll last week they were languishing at 5%, within a point of their European election rivals the Greens (who they scrupulously avoided mentioning all weekend) and UKIP, with whom they show signs of becoming somewhat obsessed.
Unless one of these three parties can make a break-out and double its current level of support, the six European seats are likely to be shared by the SNP (three is possible for them), Labour (who look set to hold two) and the Conservatives, who should hang on to their seat.
The problem is that in successive electoral contests the LibDems have been shedding votes.
They are at their best when pursuing traditional strengths such as civil liberties and localism. In the merger of Scotland's police forces and the current use — some would say abuse — of stop and search powers, they have hit a rich seam.
But when Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg and Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander restate the case against a currency union it draws attention to their relationship with David Cameron and George Osborne, reminding Scots voters why they fell out of love with the LibDems.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article