ALEX Salmond has ruled out using Trident as a bargaining chip in any negotiations over currency union in the event of a Yes vote, saying that it will never be up for negotiation.
The First Minister said "Project Fear" was "holed below the water line" after the admission by an unnamed UK minister that an independent Scotland would use sterling. "Their bluff has been called," added the First Minister.
Downing Street said the hunt was on to identify the minister who contradicted Chancellor George Osborne's insistence that sharing the currency had been ruled out. As it had been suggested maintaining Trident at Faslane might be a quid pro quo for agreeing a currency deal, Defence Secretary Philip Hammond felt compelled to stress he was not the source of the story.
Mr Salmond said: "On the issue of Trident, our opposition to nuclear weapons is not a campaign tactic or a negotiating position - it is one of the reasons for Scotland being independent. The negotiations will take place about share of debt, not about things like Trident, which we are unambiguously opposed to."
Predicting the story would have a long-term impact, he said: "It has been a very difficult 48 hours for the No campaign and it's going to get a lot worse because they are not basing their arguments on a positive vision of the future."
However, Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael insisted: "I think most fair-minded observers will look at this and they will say on the one hand you have got an anonymous source speaking off the record, on the other hand, you have got the Governor of the Bank of England, and the very detailed advice of the permanent secretary to the Treasury to the Chancellor saying this is something we would not advise you to be part of."
Alistair Darling, head of Better Together said: "A currency union would not be good for Scotland or the rest of the UK. That's why it wouldn't happen, no matter what anonymous quotes people read."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article