Max Clifford was "greedy" and liked women, but was never interested in "silly little girls", he told a court.
The PR guru told Southwark Crown Court he had never been sexually frustrated and had had several "loving relationships" with women, and never needed to pursue young girls.
Mr Clifford, 70, who is accused of 11 counts of indecent assault against seven girls and women, has previously branded his accusers "fantasists and opportunists" from the witness box.
As his cross-examination by prosecutor Rosina Cottage QC continued yesterday, the PR advisor was taken through some of his diaries from the late 1970s that included regular references to appointments with different women, including employees, some of whom he has admitted having affairs with.
He told the court: "I was never frustrated....I have been very lucky."
Mr Clifford said he had a "totally loving relationship" with his wife, as well as "loving relationships" with other long-standing mistresses but told the jury he had "no interest or attraction" to young girls.
"I was not sexually frustrated which was what you suggested," he told Ms Cottage.
"I was very happy with my sex life and I didn't need to impress young girls to achieve any kind of sexual satisfaction or interest or stimulation.
"It has never been me, that's not the person I ever was."
He said he was "greedy" in that he had a wife, as well as having affairs, adding: "But I was never frustrated and never interested in silly little girls".
Mr Clifford said there had been "various parts of nudity over 30 or 40 years" in his office, and described a prank where he and comedians Freddie Starr and Lennie Bennett arranged for several girls to be sat topless in his office as a producer for Morecambe and Wise visited.
He denied involvement with James Bond films, other than being PR agent for Suzanne Dando, who was in Octopussy.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article