SCOTLAND'S second-largest health board has admitted it is expecting to have to make £400 million of savings over the next decade.
NHS Lothian said rises in its funding were not likely to keep pace with increasing demand for its services from an expanding elderly population.
The board, which said expenses were also going up as a result of developments in medical technology, said increasing productivity and efficiency alone would not be enough to bridge an annual £40m funding gap over the next 10 years and cuts in some areas would be necessary.
The organisation, which has an annual budget of £1.4 billion and is responsible for the health of about 800,000 people, is to take urgent action in identifying "areas for disinvestment" as it attempts to improve services at the same time as making substantial savings.
Buildings deemed unfit for purpose will be sold while the public will be encouraged to "take greater ownership" for their health needs and help in reducing avoidable demand on services.
Labour Lothians MSP Sarah Boyack called on the Scottish Government to state whether it would fund the health and social care services needed to cope with an increasing population on top of the rise in the number of elderly patients.
"NHS Lothian already struggles to meet national targets so we need to know what will go with the £400m savings and 'disinvestments' mentioned," she said.
In a document entitled Our Health, Our Care, Our Future, the health board also revealed plans to build a new regional cancer centre in Edinburgh, develop a new "care village" in the capital and eliminate bed blocking.
NHS Lothian chief executive Tim Davison said: "There is an increasing risk that unless we fundamentally change the way we work and organise our services, that the quality of patient care will deteriorate and we will fall short of meeting the needs and expectations of the population we are here to serve.
"We are proposing some bold steps to transform the way services are delivered to ensure they can keep up with modern-day demands and provide safe and effective care."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article