Conservative Culture Secretary Maria Miller was clinging on to her job last night despite being ordered to pay back £5800 in mortgage expenses and make a humiliating apology to MPs.
Mrs Miller was cleared of breaking strict parliamentary rules by moving her parents into her taxpayer-funded second home.
But she faced heavy criticism from the cross-party Commons Standards Committee for failing to co-operate fully with its 15-month investigation.
Last night Labour MPs denounced the findings as a whitewash and called for Mrs Miller, one of the few women in David Cameron's cabinet, to be sacked.
Downing Street insisted the Prime Minister was standing by her and that she had his "very strong and very warm support". Later Mr Cameron himself said: "Maria Miller is doing an excellent job as Culture Secretary and will continue to do that."
But John Mann, the Labour MP for Bassetlaw who made the original complaint, said the Tory MP had been "found to have acted in a way that is completely unacceptable for a minister".
He added that given DavidCameron's past statements on cleaning up MPs expenses the Prime Minister would be accused of "hypocrisy" if he did not sack Mrs Miller.
The committee report found she should have declared as her main family home her London property, where her parents also lived, because she was spending most nights there.
That meant that she should have claimed taxpayers funds instead on her other home, in her Basingstoke constituency.
But the decision was "finely balanced", it added, and the MP had acted "reasonably in the light of the guidance available at the time". The report made clear there was nothing in the rules preventing Mrs Miller from moving her parents into an expenses-funded home - as long as she reduced claims to take account of the situation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article