A SEARCH for clues on the body of a schoolgirl found more than 27 years ago may have captured DNA, even though its use in solving crime was unknown at the time, a trial has heard.
An attempt to check for fibres sticking to Elaine Doyle's naked body may also have preserved DNA from "a third party", the murder trial was told.
The High Court in Edinburgh heard about the obstacles confronting police when Elaine's body was found in Greenock in June 1986.
A veteran forensic scientist said: "It was a particularly difficult crime scene to manage."
The exposed body in an area overlooked by houses meant the examination of the crime scene had to be completed as quickly as possible so that Elaine's body could be taken away.
Keith Eynon, former head of forensic support with Strathclyde Police, recalled how he was called to a lane off Ardgowan Street where the 16-year-old girl was lying.
He told the trial: "The body was exposed. There were people milling around in the area.
"I was told the deceased's parents lived nearby so there were a lot of issues over and above the normal scene examination."
The problems led to "a certain urgency", said Mr Eynon who retired 20 years later.
Mr Enyon, 68, told the trial: "DNA didn't exist as far as forensic scientists were concerned." He went on to tell how he checked for possible footprints, but the ground was too hard.
He could see no obvious bloodstains. The next step was to check for fibres which might be clinging to the body and might link the dead girl to her killer. He described how broad adhesive tape was used to try to pick up hairs or fibres, something which had to be done before the body was moved.
John Docherty, 49, of Hunters' Quay, Holiday Village, Dunoon, denies murdering jeweller's assistant Elaine. He claims at the time he is alleged to have stripped and strangled the 16-year-old he was at home with his parents who are no longer alive.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article