THEY have been decried as a scar on Glasgow's cityscape, a symbol of deprivation and, at times, desperation.
But the decision to simultaneously blow up five of the remaining six Red Road tower blocks in a 15-second spectacle beamed onto screens at Celtic Park on July 23 has bitterly divided public opinion in Scotland and beyond. And now some big names from the world of art and architecture are wading in and pulling no punches.
More than 4000 people have signed a petition against the move, with critics dubbing it crass, insensitive and a "spectacle on the cheap". Alexander Stoddart, sculptor to the Queen in Scotland, said demolition as entertainment was the "hallmark of barbarism".
Architecture critic Jonathan Meades, who fronted a BBC documentary on brutalist style earlier this year, criticised the idea as "half-witted" populism.
He said: "Instead of committing yet another act of municipal vandalism, Glasgow's appalling council, which has a lot of form in this area, might have asked itself why it didn't maintain the structures it built.
"High-rise works well in the private sector for the rich and even the modestly well-off - their buildings are defended, serviced, cleaned. The public sector has shown over again that it fosters neglect and all the problems that come with it."
Demolition of the GHA-owned towers was already planned for later this year, but the idea to amalgamate it into the opening ceremony appears to have been the brainchild of the 2014 creative team, spearheaded by US events company Jack Morton Worldwide.
The firm previously staged opening ceremonies for the 2004 Athens Olympics and the 2010 World Cup in South Africa.
Its artistic director David Zolkwer - Glasgow 2014's answer to Danny Boyle - said the demolition would be "an important opportunity for us to contemplate the many lives lived in the tower blocks over the last 50 years."
Residents evacuated from the demolition zone, including asylum seekers housed in the only tower that will remain standing, are to be offered free passes to view the blowdown from Glasgow Green - a move that has in itself been criticised as insensitive.
The towers were the tallest homes in Europe when construction was completed in 1969. At the time they were cutting-edge, drawing some 5000 tenants from inner-city Glasgow who marvelled at the panoramic views from 300ft up.
However, as the decades passed the Red Road flats became synonymous with crime, drug abuse and vandalism. In 2010, the tragedy of psychologically disturbed asylum seeker Serge Serykh made national news after the Russian leapt from the balcony of his 15th-floor flat, taking his wife Tatiana and 21-year-old stepson with him.
Their application to remain in the UK had been rejected days before.
A spokesman for Glasgow City Council said: "Such is the community that's there and has been there that we felt it was incredibly important to ensure that we paid tribute to them by including them as a part of the opening ceremony.
"Glasgow could have had an opening ceremony where everything was shiny and new, but we wanted it to be authentic to Glasgow and all sides of Glasgow. Given that these towers were coming down anyway, it seemed fitting to bring them down spectacularly."
City council leader Gordon Matheson, who has written to each affected household, said this week: "Their (the blocks') demolition will all but mark the end of high-rise living in the area and is symbolic of the changing face of Glasgow."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Glasgow 2014 are responsible for the content of the opening and closing ceremonies. Through the Glasgow 2014 strategic group meetings, ministers have been informed of plans and proposals for ceremonies."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article