MOST of BBC3's output was at "the embarrassing end of drivel", according to corporation veteran Michael Buerk.
The BBC announced earlier this year that the digital channel is moving online to save £50 million a year.
It will be replaced with a BBC1 +1 service and an extra hour of children's programmes. Some of its existing shows will be shown on BBC1 and BBC2, with the majority available on the iPlayer. Buerk, whose BBC career includes stints on The One Show, The Moral Maze and BBC Breakfast, described Snog, Marry, Avoid?, which has run on the digital channel for six series, as "cutting-edge tripe". He said: "The BBC had BBC3, a channel much maligned in its lifetime, mourned unconvincingly in its passing, rather like Tony Benn. It did launch a few good comedies, but a lot of what I saw was at the embarrassing end of drivel. 'Britain's bravest youth media brand', as the BBC put it, will be relegated to the internet.
"We're told that's where youngsters forage for their entertainment these days, but everybody's still acting as though BBC3 has had a bullet in the back of the head." Among the shows launched on BBC3 are Gavin and Stacey, Little Britain and the award-winning documentary Our War. Some quarter of a million people have signed an online petition asking the BBC to reconsider its plans.
Zai Bennett, who took over as controller of the digital channel in 2011, said the move was an enormous risk. BBC director-general Tony Hall has described it as the right thing to do.
In an email to staff when the change was announced last month, he said the licence fee had been frozen while the demands on it increased. He said: "This is the first time in the BBC's history we are proposing to close a television channel."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article