A FATHER and son have been banned from keeping dogs for 10 years and ordered to carry out 250 hours of community work after damaging a badger sett in a bid to take or kill the animals.
John Frame Murray, 57, and his son, also John, 34, dug into what was thought to be a badger sett at Drummond Hill, near Sandilands, Lanark, on February 2, 2012.
They were spotted by people who managed to take photographs of them in the act and animal welfare officers were called in.
The Scottish SPCA, which led the investigation, searched the mens' homes in Earn Gardens, Larkhall, and discovered three dogs, all of whom had injuries which suggested they had been in face-to-face confrontation with badgers.
The men were found guilty at Hamilton Sheriff Court last month of three charges contrary to the Protection of Badgers Act 1992. They were sentenced yesterday and told to carry out community service within nine months.
Scottish SPCA Chief Superintendent Mike Flynn said: "This was a very complex and challenging investigation requiring technical forensic work and a great deal of time and specialist resources.
"During the course of our investigation we found and seized three dogs, two Patterdale terriers and one Staffordshire bull terrier.
"Both Patterdales were found to have severe injuries to their lower jaws, including tearing to the lips and missing teeth. The Staffordshire bull terrier had injuries to its upper and lower lips and nose and missing teeth.
"Following the outcome of this case we are very pleased we can now find these three dogs the loving new homes they deserve.
"This case serves as a warning that we will do all we can to identify and detect persons involved in this barbaric activity."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article