JOHN Major famously said that as soon as a Prime Minister crossed the No 10 threshold he, or she, began to lose touch with reality.
The events that have cost Maria Miller her job suggest that after four years in the Coalition hothouse David Cameron failed to gauge the sense of public and Parliamentary outrage that still exists over MPs' expenses. It shows the tremors from the 2009 earthquake that shook Westminster to its core are still being felt.
Last week, the Prime Minister, when asked about the Culture Secretary, sought robustly to draw a line under it; said she had promised to repay the money, had made an apology and so "we should leave it there".
But there was seething anger not least among the new Tory intake, who, with marginal seats, felt that they were being tarnished with an old brush.
Even when Cabinet ministers were called on to support their colleague, their reluctance was clear to see and they could only muster lukewarm support.
On Tuesday, Mary Macleod, Ms Miller's parliamentary aide, went on a media offensive to defend her colleague and accuse the media of a witch hunt. One theory is that this was a deliberate water-testing exercise, which showed how little support there was for Ms Miller.
Asked repeatedly if a grey-suited "emissary" from Downing Street had later that day contacted Ms Miller to tell her what to do, all the PM and No 10 would say was the decision to resign was hers. By not answering the question, they appeared to answer it and that Ms Miller had, in fact, been left in no uncertain terms what to do.
Time is beginning to run short for Mr Cameron to rediscover the pulse of public opinion; otherwise, next year it could be the public that tells the Tory leader to go.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article