ALMOST nine out of 10 people believe Maria Miller was right to resign as Culture Secretary, with two-thirds saying David Cameron had handled the issue of her over-claimed expenses badly, according to a Comres poll.
In a day of high drama at Westminster, the Prime Minister sought to justify why, after six days of bad headlines and a draining away of backbench support for the Hampshire MP, he had not sacked her.
"If people clear themselves of a serious offence, you let them get on with their job; you let them try to do their job," he told MPs. "That is actually the right thing to do. Firing someone at the first sign of trouble; that is not actually leadership, that is weakness."
But Mr Cameron admitted public anger at MPs' expenses was still "raw" despite the scandal breaking five years ago.
He acknowledged that the furious public reaction to the disclosure Ms Miller had wrongly claimed thousands of pounds in mortgage interest payments showed further reform of the expenses system was essential.
Labour leader Ed Miliband focused on what he branded the PM's "terrible error of judgment" in failing to sack her immediately after the publication of last week's Commons Standards Committee report. He accused the Tory leader of being an "apologist for unacceptable behaviour".
The announcement by Downing Street of Ms Miller's resignation came just after 7am yesterday. It followed a late-night telephone conversation between the Secretary of State and the Prime Minister as he was returning to London after attending a state banquet at Windsor Castle in honour of Irish President Michael Higgins.
Earlier, an emotional Ms Miller insisted she took "full responsibility" for her decision to go, saying she had become a "distraction" from the work of government.
"This has been a really difficult 16 months. Because I was cleared of the central allegation made about me by a Labour MP I hoped I could stay, but it has become clear to me it has become an enormous distraction," she said.
Although Ms Miller was cleared by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards of using taxpayer-funded expenses to provide a home for her elderly parents, she was told she should repay £45,000 wrongly claimed towards mortgage payments.
The sum was reduced to £5800 by the Commons Standards Committee. Nonetheless, she was ordered to apologise to MPs for failing to co-operate with the commissioner's inquiry.
The brevity and tone of that apology further fuelled criticism of the Basingstoke MP, and a growing number of Tory MPs joined a chorus of disapproval.
No 10 announced Ms Miller's replacement would be Treasury Minister Sajid Javid, a former millionaire investment banker.
However, a row broke out over the issue of the women's minister. Ms Miller had overseen the women's and equalities brief, and the former went to current Treasury Minister Nicky Morgan, who voted against gay marriage.
Downing Street stressed Ms Morgan would be able to attend Cabinet. But it was later announced she would answer not to Mr Javid, who has overall responsibility for the women's and equalities portfolio, but to Mr Cameron himself.
Labour accused the PM of having a "blind spot" when it came to women and called the reshuffle a "complete mess".
Meanwhile, Ms Miller said she would donate her ministerial payoff, which will be about £17,000, to a local charity,
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article