THE futility of locking many women up in prison has long been recognised.
Most female prisoners are behind bars for low-level offences such as shoplifting, drugs crimes and breach of the peace. Many have mental health issues or are victims of physical and sexual abuse; few have to be in prison for reasons of public protection.
Reports have noted that 80% of women in Cornton Vale have mental health problems and 60% of women prisoners said they had been under the influence of drugs at the time of their crime. Prison clearly does not seem to be providing the solution, with seven out of 10 women offenders who receive a prison sentence of three months or less being convicted again within two years. Their children are also adversely affected and have a higher risk of ending up in prison themselves.
With these grim litany of statistics, it is little wonder that many believe a far more effective way to respond would be to keep these women out of prison wherever possible and instead focus on help and support, with sentences served in the community.
Yet the female prison population stands today at more than 400, despite calls more than 10 years ago to aim to reduce the numbers to a quarter of that. Two years on from Dame Elish Angiolini's Commission on Women Offenders report, progress is being made with plans to close Cornton Vale. The new facility at HMP Inverclyde, due to open in four years' time, can be seen as a step in the right direction.
However, fears have been raised that having a 350-bed facility and smaller regional prisons is designed to cope with growth, rather than a fall in female prisoner numbers. It should not simply become a means of displacing numbers to another jail and repeat the patterns of the past.
There will always be women who should be in prison due to the seriousness of their crimes. But continually locking up those women who are already struggling and marginalised in society, as one commentator noted, is simply a Victorian solution in 21st-century Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article