THE pay bill for some of the BBC's biggest screen and radio stars, including Graham Norton and Jeremy Clarkson, is to be examined in a review by the BBC Trust, which will look at how the costs compare to commercial rivals.
Among those thought to be some of the highest-paid figures at the corporation are presenters such as chat show host and Radio 2 star Norton, Top Gear's Clarkson, Newsnight's Jeremy Paxman and Fiona Bruce from BBC1's Antiques Roadshow.
The Trust has now announced it will look into the issue of "talent" pay - which is thought to amount to around £200 million annually - among its programme of reviews over the coming months. The last time it scrutinised the issue was in 2009 at a time when there was disquiet about the levels of pay for big names such as Jonathan Ross, who has now left the BBC in the wake of the Sachsgate scandal. The talent bill is now said to have been reduced by 13%.
An independent consultant with expertise in the market will be brought in to look at the BBC's mechanisms for controlling its outlay for talent, which eats up the equivalent of more than 1.3 million licence fees.
The Trust said that the review, beginning later this spring, "will examine the BBC's processes to control costs in recruiting and developing talent, and benchmark against the wider market".
Last year's annual report for the BBC revealed there are 14 stars who are paid more than £500,000 annually although that was down from 16 for the previous year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article