FORMER TV-am host Nick Owen has warned that viewers are put off ITV's ailing breakfast programmes because of how much their big-name presenters are said to be paid.
Strictly Come Dancing star Susanna Reid, 43, announced last month that she was defecting from BBC Breakfast to front ITV's new breakfast show Good Morning Britain, in a reported £1 million deal.
The show replaces Daybreak, whose launch presenters Adrian Chiles and Christine Bleakley were dropped, despite their bumper pay packets, a little over a year after the programme first went on air.
But Owen, who helped turn around TV-am's fortunes in the early 1980s, told Radio Times magazine: "I joined TV-am after a raft of big names had failed - David Frost, Michael Parkinson, Anna Ford, Angela Rippon.... they'd not caught on with the viewers at all.
"They'd been turned down by Terry Wogan and Michael Aspel, so I was filling in until they could find someone, basically. But because no-one was watching, we could try things out. They hired Anne Diamond at my suggestion and we had a boy-and-girl-next-door thing."
The presenter added: "I think all these announcements about high salaries alienate viewers. Here's someone on a million pounds - you will enjoy them. Who can relate to a presenter like that?"
ITV, which has been attempting to compete against BBC Breakfast since Daybreak launched, with much fanfare, in 2010, has not confirmed how much it is paying Reid, who will be joined by former GMTV star Ben Shephard, Charlotte Hawkins and Sean Fletcher on Good Morning Britain.
Former GMTV presenter Fiona Phillips, who left the show in 2008, said that presenters must reflect their audience.
"Eamonn Holmes and I -you can't manufacture that sort of chemistry," she said. "We'd both come from the same backgrounds as the viewers - our parents had worked hard, we had worked hard up through the ranks to get there."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article