AN acquaintance of Elaine Doyle has been shown a sketch of a suspect who might have killed her — and denied it was him.
The picture was drawn by a police artist after a sighting of a young man acting suspiciously in a Greenock stairwell the night the teenager died, more than 27 years ago. A trial has seen two versions, one black and white and another in colour,- showing distinctive ginger or auburn hair.
At the High Court in Edinburgh, William Campbell, 51, agreed that back in 1986 his hair was auburn but had turned grey because of nerves. Looking at the sketch he told the jury: "My hair may have been the same colour but it was a completely different style."
John Docherty, 49, is on trial and denies murder. He claims the true killer may be on of a list of 41 names drawn up by his defence team. Mr Campbell, whose name is on the list, was asked if he killed the 16-year-old and replied: "No".
A police report from 1986 described the relationship between him and Ms Doyle as "on talking terms at a pool hall". Mr Campbell told the trial that Ms Doyle was his friend and would joke about him being her boyfriend to cheer him up when he felt low and depressed.
Another witness, who like Ms Doyle and her friends hung around a pool hall in Greenock, said it was "ridiculous" his name was on the same list of suspects.
Port operator Martin Docherty, 45, said he would sometimes walk Ms Doyle home but they were "just friends."
John Docherty, now of Hunters' Quay, Holiday Village, Dunoon, denies murder and claims that at the time he is alleged to have stripped and strangled Elaine he was with his parents, who are no longer alive, at their home in Anne Street.
He also denies stealing a handbag from Ardgowan Street on the same date.
He further denies a charge of attacking another woman, Linda Hargie, on various occasions between 1990 and 1995 in Anne Street.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article