A MAN accused of inciting villagers to murder a renowned Scottish geologist has claimed the victim had threatened them with eviction.
Daniel Mdachi Mnene Suleiman told a court in Mombassa, Kenya, that Campbell Bridges, who was beaten and stabbed to death in August 2009, had been involved in the bitter dispute with villagers at his ranch.
Mr Suleiman, who along with six other people has pleaded not guilty to murdering Mr Bridges, told his trial yesterday: "We had a problem with Bridges because he used to come to our farm in company of his armed security threatening us with eviction."
Before 2006, he said he sold gemstones to Mr Bridges but the pair fell out after he began mining the precious resources himself.
The Scot, he alleged, claimed he was the only one with the right to mine for the stones which are worth fortunes on the international markets.
"I used to sell gemstones to him in early 1990s but when I started mining gemstone at Mwasiu ranch things changed until we used to quarrel with him over the mining rights he had in the place," said Mr Suleiman.
The co-accused argued that although Mr Bridges had been given prospecting rights after settling there in 1971, another man, Jack Shako, was in fact given that option four years later and he had no further claim.
Mr Suleiman, who claims to have been hundreds of miles away in Nairobi at the time of the killing, said he was married into the Shako family and had the right to mine for gemstones.
He added: "That is why I kept on fighting against Bridges' domination of mining of gemstones in the area."
His co-accused also deny murdering Mr Bridges in southern Kenya.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article