A LEADING Scots businessman tried to get the country's jobs quango removed from a publicly-funded Dragons' Den-style scheme for entrepreneurs.
Jim Duffy, whose presence as a judge for the £2 million Scottish Edge Awards has come in for criticism, privately told the Government the competition should be pulled out of Scottish Enterprise control and attacked public-sector "entitlement".
Funded by the Government and run by Scottish Enterprise, the Edge gives cash prizes to businesses with innovative ideas.
The competition was the brainchild of Duffy, who is "chief executive optimist" of business hatchery Entrepreneurial Spark (ESpark), and was staged three times last year: in February, June and December.
However, the competition became embroiled in conflict-of-interest claims after it emerged that more than half of the finalists for the June event were linked to Entrepreneurial Spark.
Duffy was also one of the shortlisting judges. His presence in the sift for the June awards triggered complaints and he withdrew as a sifting panellist, but he was reinstated for the December round of Edge awards.
Correspondence between Duffy and the Government reveals the mentor's frustration with Scottish Enterprise and his desire for a bigger role in the scheme.
Days after the first Edge awards in February - a judging process in which he was not involved - he emailed the Government, saying: "Can you see how in this country we create an Entrepreneurs Fund and everyone grabs it with public sector expectation and entitlement? The Edge can be administered by SE, but must quickly move away or it will be quagmired in bureaucracy."
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: "Partner organisations regularly exchange free and frank views on the future direction of the Scottish Edge to ensure that the potential of Scotland's future entrepreneurial successes are realised."
Entrepreneurial Spark did not respond to a request for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article