A DEFENCE minister vowed to curb a culture of "drinking to the point of oblivion" in the armed forces as she faced calls to scrap subsidised alcohol in military bars.
Anna Soubry said her fears about the impact of drink had been heightened by the suicide of one serving member.
She told MPs she was not a killjoy and recognised from her time as a barrister that people with stressful jobs needed to let their hair down.
However, she said the "vast amounts" consumed by the armed forces were unacceptable and must be scaled back.
During a hearing of the defence select committee, she said: "I am not convinced that we couldn't do more about the culture of drinking in our armed forces.
"I'm not some killjoy. But sometimes there has been an attitude in the past that it was acceptable, as part of that destressing process, to all go out and consume vast amounts of alcohol as part of that camaraderie and that letting down of the hair."
She suggested that her determination to act had been strengthened by the death of a serving member of the armed forces.
Pressed on what specific action she would take, she said a senior commander's guide to alcohol was to be refreshed in the light of research into alcohol abuse in the armed forces which was due to be published soon.
However, she acknowledged that a cultural shift could not be encouraged purely by rules and regulations.
She said: "You can't just put out edicts to change a culture."
Labour MP Madeleine Moon said ending the "high level of subsidy" enjoyed at military bars would contribute to curbing consumption.
She said she got the "fright of my life" when she was charged only £1 for a triple gin and tonic while visiting forces in the Falkland Islands two years ago.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article